<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>publications &#8211; FAERE</title>
	<atom:link href="https://faere.fr/en/category/publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://faere.fr/en/</link>
	<description>French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>2026</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2026-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorothée Charlier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/2026-2/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-526a47846346f52"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><p>I am text block. Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.</p>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2026</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorothée Charlier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 09:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/2026/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-986a4784634851c"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4>WP 2026.05 &ndash;&nbsp;<a href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Prieur_FAERE_WP2026.05.pdf">Strategic Fossil Expansion and the Timing of the Energy Transition</a></h4>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong>Fabien Prieur</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><span>We develop a dynamic model of exhaustible resource exploitation, with exploration, in which a regulator determines the end date of the fossil regime by trading off industry profits against climate damages. The weight assigned to damages reflects the fossil industry&rsquo;s pre-existing political influence. We compare Nash and Stackelberg interactions between the industry and the regulator. Under Nash behavior, regulation shortens the fossil regime and reduces cumulative emissions relative to the unregulated benchmark. Under Stackelberg leadership, however, a monopoly may increase exploration relative to the Nash outcome in order to delay the transition. Calibrating the model to global oil market data, we obtain that strategic leadership increases reserves by approximately 7% relative to the Nash outcome and delays the transition by about 2-3 years. The analysis thus provides an explanation for sustained upstream fossil fuel investment despite announced net-zero commitments.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2026.04 &ndash; <a href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Sanou_FAERE_WP2026.04.pdf">Employment effects of environmental taxes and subsidies</a></h4>
<div>
<p><strong>Issa Sanou</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This paper presents a new perspective on environmental tax reform. Assuming that households prefer clean goods over dirty ones, we demonstrate that implementing taxes on dirty goods alongside subsidies for clean goods can lead to an increase in employment. This rise in employment is driven by enhanced purchasing power resulting from a greater decline in prices compared to wages, motivating households to work more. As for the environmental dividend, consumption of polluting goods tends to decrease. However, an unintended feedback effect emerges due to the increased purchasing power resulting from the positive impact of subsidies on employment and the consumption of non-polluting goods. If the two types of goods are not perfect substitutes, this rise in purchasing power can lead to greater consumption of polluting goods, thereby limiting improvements in environmental quality. Hence, while subsidy policies can be more acceptable due to the employment benefit, their efficiency is still questionable.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2026.03 &ndash; <a href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Emenegger_etal_FAERE_WP2026.03.pdf"><span>The Study of the Economic Effects for an Island of a Disruption in Commercial Links with the Mainland: The Case of the Island of Yeu</span></a></h4>
<p><strong>Hugo Emenegger &ndash; Cl&eacute;ment Cohic &ndash; Sophie Pardo &ndash; Agn&egrave;s Baltzer &ndash; Elsa Cariou</strong></p>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">
</p></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div><span lang="EN-US">Assessing the impacts of climate change is essential to making informed decisions about protective planning against climate risks. These impacts can be direct (resulting from the physical effect of the hazard on assets) or indirect (arising from direct impacts). The evaluation of direct damages is relatively consensual and is usually conducted through damage stage-damage functions. However, the evaluation of indirect damages creates significant debate within the scientific community. This article proposes a volumetric analysis of the indirect impacts of sea level rise on insular economic activity. One of the characteristics of the Island of Yeu&rsquo;s economy is its strong dependence on imports from the mainland. The method presented here estimates the concrete effects of a disruption in maritime connections between the island and the mainland for each economic entity of the territory, defining thresholds of impact ranging from stockout to generalized shortages across the island. This research also allows us to observe certain aggravating factors of impacts, particularly those related to the tourism economy. Results show, for example, that the hotel and catering sector is the most vulnerable to this risk and could experience a stockout after five days without island resupply. This result leads to a risk of shortages, exacerbated during the summer period by the sharp increase in the number of people on the island. The work presented leads us to consider volumetric analysis of indirect impacts as complementary to monetary evaluation methods, since it produces results at the micro- and meso-economic levels of a radically different nature, enabling the identification of levers of action to better protect the assets of a territory.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2026.02 &nbsp;<span lang="EN-US"></span><a href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Pivart_Martinet_FAERE_WP2026.02.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">Reconciling Eco and Ego? The interplay between environmental and image concerns in consumption choices</span></a></h4>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<p><strong><span lang="EN-US">J&eacute;r&ocirc;me Pivard &ndash; </span>Vincent Martinet</strong></p>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">We explore the interplay between two key individual drivers of green consumption: intrinsic moral concerns for the environment and reputational concerns for social image. Our microeconomic behavioral model characterizes choices among lifestyles differing in environmental impacts (brown/green) and conspicuousness (positional/discreet), depending on how strongly one values each of these motives. We show that image concerns can substitute for environmental concerns in driving green consumption across a limited but central range of preferences, in particular through the purchase of green positional goods. Such conspicuous conservation can green individual consumption (reconciling Eco and Ego), especially among image-sensitive consumers, but it yields environmental benefits only under specific economic conditions. Indeed, the environmental impact of a lifestyle depends critically on its relative impact intensity, i.e., the pollution per dollar spent on this lifestyle, more than on the pollution per unit of the representative good of the lifestyle, driving volume effects and behavioral rebound effects, which both reduce the environmental benefits of green lifestyles. Knowing the collective distribution of preferences may help design targeted policies, as those preferences strongly determine policy effectiveness. Our findings are especially relevant for policies that aim to foster greener consumption choices in different economic contexts (e.g., green nudging, environmental taxes with higher rates on positional goods&hellip;).</span></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4 style="font-weight: 400;"><strong><span style="font-family: inherit;">WP 2026.01 </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: inherit;"></span><a style="font-family: inherit;" href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Peligry_Sempe_FAERE_WP2026.01.pdf">Climate Policies in the Housing Market?</a></strong></h4>
<div>
<p><strong>Paloma P&eacute;ligry &ndash; Gr&eacute;goire Semp&eacute;</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<p>Mitigating CO2 emissions in housing through retrofits has emerged as a crucial political&nbsp;issue. In this paper, we assess the macroeconomic and distributional impacts of&nbsp;key climate policies in the residential housing market. We build a quantitative heterogeneous agent model featuring high (green) and low (brown) energy efficient houses. Brown&nbsp;houses are associated with an additional cost of energy and can be retrofitted to a green house. We compare the effects of three policies: a tax on energy, a tax on brown rental&nbsp;income and a retrofit subsidy. The taxes widen the green to brown price ratio by penalizing brown houses, whereas the subsidy reduces it by lowering the substitution cost. The&nbsp;energy tax raises the user cost of brown housing, tightening affordability and increasing the renter share. The tax on brown rental income generates a &ldquo;brown reallocation&rdquo;: by&nbsp;decreasing brown house prices while leaving the user cost unchanged, it induces low-income renters to transition into brown homeownership. Finally, the subsidy improves&nbsp;affordability, enabling low-income households to enter green homeownership.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2025</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2025-4/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorothée Charlier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 07:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/2025-4/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-656a478463498c5"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h3>PP 2025.01 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/PolicyPapers/Funke_Mattauch_Douenne_Fabre_Stiglitz_FAERE_PP2025.01.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">Supporting carbon pricing when interest rates are higher</span></a></h3>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Franziska Funke &ndash; Linus Mattauch &ndash; Thomas Douenne &ndash; Adrien Fabre &ndash; Joseph Stiglitz</strong></p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">To accept carbon pricing, citizens desire viable alternatives to fossil-fuel based options. As inflation and higher interest rates have exacerbated access barriers for capital-intensive green substitutes, the political success of carbon pricing will be measured by how well policy design enables consumers to switch.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2025</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2025-3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorothée Charlier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/2025-3/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-716a4784634a9e5"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column"><div class="wpb_wrapper"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section><section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-106a4784634b212"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4>WP 2025.10 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/CASSIN_MELINDI-GHIDI_PRIEUR_FAERE_WP2025.10.pdf">The impact of income inequality on public environmental expenditure with green consumers</a></h4>
<div>
<p><strong>Lesly Cassin- &nbsp;Paolo Melindi-Ghidi &ndash; Fabien Prieur</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">This article analyzes the impact of income inequality on environmental policy in the presence of green<br>
consumers. We first perform an empirical analysis using a panel of European countries over the period 1995-2021. The results show a negative relationship between inequality and public environmental expenditure, which is weaker with higher inequality. We also find a negative correlation between environmental expenditure<br>
and green consumption, that highlights the substitutable nature of the relationship between the two variables.<br>
We next develop a model with two main ingredients: citizens with different income capacities have access to two commodities that differ in terms of environmental impact, and they vote on the environmental policy.<br>
In equilibrium, the population is divided into two groups, conventional vs green consumers. An increase in inequality raises the marginal cost of policy through size and composition effects. The higher the equilibrium tax, the larger the overall effect. This provides us with an explanation of the main empirical result.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.09 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Pottier_Combet_de%20Lauretis_FAERE_WP2025.09.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">&nbsp;Gender and climate change: do men emit more GHG than women?</span></a></h4>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Antonin Pottier -Emmanuel Combet &ndash; Simona de Lauretis</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This paper discusses the differential contributions of men and women to consumption- based emissions. The effect of gender on GHG emissions is difficult to assess because it correlates with other determinants, such as income and the size and composition of household that people are part of. We review the scant evidence available in the literature, with equivocal results.<br>
Using consumption-based emissions of French households, we show that pooling households of different size and composition cannot provide reliable estimates of the<br>
effect of gender of the head of household on emissions. Our empirical strategy therefore focuses on one-person households. With multi-variate regressions, we find that, other things being equal, there is no significant difference between single men and women, provided they are younger than 80. Women over 80 years old emit less than their male.<br>
</span></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.08 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Hoarau_Ponssard_FAERE_WP2025.08.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">The adoption of CCS by the cement industry: a game theoretic analysis</span></a></h4>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Jean-Pierre Ponssard &ndash; Quentin Hoarau</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><span>This paper analyzes the adoption of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in the cement industry, a hard-to-abate sector, by modeling firms&rsquo; strategic choices of adoption timing as a continuous-time game under Cournot competition. The model considers a polluting technology whose cost increases over time due to the social cost of carbon, and a clean CCS technology involving a fixed sunk cost.<br>
We find that imperfect competition in the cement sector delays CCS adoption, with a Pareto-dominant Nash equilibrium corresponding to simultaneous adoption.<br>
We examine two types of public policies to correct this inefficiency: a subsidy on the fixed cost of CCS and a time-dependent subsidy on profit flows. While both instruments can lead to socially optimal adoption, the fixed-cost subsidy is easier to implement but more expensive.<br>
Our numerical application shows that, in the absence of policy intervention, CCS adoption is delayed by ten years relative to the social optimum. To achieve the optimal timing, the fixed-cost subsidy would need to cover about 70\% of the investment cost, while the time-dependent subsidy would be roughly three times less expensive.</span></p>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.07 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Fawaz_Gatti_FAERE_WP2025.07.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">Social Unrest and Environmental Performance</span></a></h4>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Mahdi Fawaz &ndash; Donatella Gatti</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><span>There is a growing consensus that policies such as carbon taxes are needed to improve environmental performance. We propose a theoretical framework and a model to examine how environmental concerns determine political support for carbon taxation and the incentives for the poor to revolt, replace the incumbent government, and achieve a fairer distribution of income. Our main result is that the incentive to revolt is an inverted U-shaped function of environmental performance. On the empirical side, we construct a normalized Social Unrest Index (SUI) based on riots and battles data from the ACLED database. Then, we analyze the determinants of SUI in a panel of 211 countries between 1997 and 2022 including a quadratic term of the EPI index (Yale University). We find an inverted U-shaped relationship that is robust in all the specifications tested. In autocratic regimes, as EPI rises from 30% to 40%, SUI predicted average almost doubles from 12.8% to 20.4%, while it falls at higher EPI levels. </span>Our results have important policy implications.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.06 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Constant_Davin_Lavaine_FAERE_WP2025.06.pdf">Does income inequality influence health vulnerability to pollution? Evidence from France</a></h4>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Karine Constant &ndash; Marion Davin &ndash; Emmanuelle Lavaine</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><span>This study investigates whether income inequality within a population influences the health effects of pollution. Specifically, we empirically estimate the causal impact of particulate matter (PM10) on mortality in France, using wind direction as an instrumental variable, and explore how income inequality modifies this relationship. Our findings reveal a statistically and economically significant impact of pollution exposure on the mortality of individuals aged 50 or older, which intensifies in municipalities with higher levels of income inequality. More precisely, while the effect of PM10 is not significant in municipalities with the lowest levels of disparities, it is significant for the others and increases with the level of inequality within the municipalities. The impact of PM$_{10}$ on the mortality of individuals aged 50 or older in the top 33% of municipalities with the highest inequality is up to twice as large as in municipalities with intermediate levels of inequality. This result is particularly striking given that it concerns a country like France, which has relatively low income inequality. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential underlying mechanisms, we develop a theoretical model and empirically test its predictions. We conclude that the observed variation in vulnerability to pollution across municipalities, stratified by inequality levels, could have been but is not attributable to differences in public health expenditure, pollution exposure (between and within municipalities), or poverty prevalence and intensity. Our results suggest that inequality plays a significant role in environmental health, worthy of further research.</span></p>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.05 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Brecard_ChiroleuAssouline_FAERE_WP2025.05.pdf"><span>Informing the uninformed, sensitizing the informed: The two sides of consumer environmental awareness</span></a></h4>
<div></div>
<div>
<p><strong>Doroth&eacute;e Br&eacute;card &ndash; Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline</strong></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">How do environmental information and awareness interact to improve environmental quality by changing consumer behavior and firm strategies? This article provides theoretical insights using an original differentiation model within a general framework whose specific cases have been studied previously. On the demand side, only informed consumers differentiate brown from green product quality, while uninformed consumers consider these perfect substitutes. Moreover, all informed consumers value the green product and devalue the brown product as a result of an aversion effect but are heterogeneous in their environmental awareness. On the supply side, two firms offer different environmental qualities and compete on price. We consider two types of environmental campaigns: one that increases the number of informed consumers and one that increases the environmental awareness of informed consumers. We show that these campaigns crucially determine three market configurations: segmented; fragmented, with a brown product that appeals to both uninformed consumers and a fraction of informed consumers; and covered. Assuming that the greenest consumer behavior is abstention, we find that both campaigns do not always lead to better environmental quality; that is, a situation in which all consumers are informed and some highly environmentally aware is not necessarily the greenest situation. Depending on the aversion effect, the budget of the campaign organizer, and the relative cost-effectiveness, information and awareness raising campaigns must be carefully combined to achieve the best possible environmental quality.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.04 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Couttenier_Desbureaux_Soubeyran_FAERE_WP2025.04.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">Agricultural Productivity Growth and Deforestation in the Tropics</span></a></h4>
<div></div>
<div><b><span>Mathieu Couttenier &ndash; Sebastien Desbureaux &ndash; Raphael Soubeyran </span></b></div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><span>We analyze the impact of agricultural productivity growth on tropical deforestation. Our dynamic model of forest-to-farmland conversion incorporates costs and market constraints on agricultural output, emphasizing that productivity growth, rather than its absolute level, shapes deforestation patterns. Addressing the Jevons&rsquo; paradox and Borlaug hypothesis, the model predicts that rising agricultural productivity, reflected by declining fertilizer price growth, has an ambiguous effect on deforestation. Using tropical forest loss data (2000-2022) and fertilizer price variations, we find a negative correlation between fertilizer price growth and deforestation, particularly in regions with high market potential. Without the 10% annual rise in fertilizer prices over the period, deforestation rates would have been 57% faster, representing 6.6 million additional hectares annually. Conversely, the 3% annual increase in crop prices has a minimal impact on deforestation. Our results highlight that protected areas do not mitigate the adverse effects of fertilizer price growth on deforestation.</span></p>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.03 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Pommeret_Ricci_FAERE_WP2025.03.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">Fueling the energy transition with fossil (not quite) stranded assets</span></a></h4>
<div><b><span>Aude Pommeret &ndash; Francesco Ricci </span></b></div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">The energy transition requires large quantities for raw materials to build the infrastructure needed to supply electricity from renewable sources. In the meanwhile, climate policies push out of the market some of fossil-based infrastructure, generating stranded assets. However, decommissioned infrastructure constitutes a stock of scrap, from which materials can be recovered and recycled to develop the infrastructure for renewable energy. We use a stylized dynamic model featuring the decommissioning rate as a control variable: it reduces the fossil-based infrastructure available for energy production, but also increases the scrap that offers recycling potential. With this model first we study the effect of recycling possibilities on decommissioning and on the extraction of fossil and mineral resources. Second, we can fully characterize the dynamics of the stock of scrap. Considering recycling of decommissioned fossil-based infrastructure, makes the stranded assets problem less severe, while mitigating the rise in the price of virgin materials.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.02 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/JaguSchippers_Lowing_FAERE_WP2025.02.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">Fair burden-sharing for climate change mitigation: an axiomatic approach</span></a></h4>
<div></div>
<div><b><span lang="EN-US">Emma Jagu Schippers &ndash; David Lowing</span></b></div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">A significant challenge in climate change negotiations is establishing a burden-sharing method that all or most governments find fair. Two key fairness principles are emphasized by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in allocating mitigation efforts: the Polluter-Pays principle (&ldquo;common but differentiated responsibilities&rdquo;), suggesting that the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions should contribute more, and the Ability-to-Pay principle (&ldquo;respective capabilities&rdquo;), suggesting that economically advantaged countries should contribute more. This paper proposes a new burden-sharing method that integrates the Polluter-Pays and Ability-to-Pay principles without resorting to weighted indicators. We provide an algorithmic procedure to implement the method in polynomial time and conduct an axiomatic study to emphasize the significance of our approach. </span></div>
<div><span>Finally, we apply our method using worldwide data.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2025.01 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Bareille_Soubeyran_FAERE_WP2025.01.pdf">Individual vs. collective agglomeration bonuses to conserve biodiversity</a></h4>
<div><b><span>Francois Bareille &ndash; Raphael Soubeyran </span></b></div>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Agglomeration bonuses (AB) are payments conditional on the contiguity of landowners&rsquo; conservation areas. It is widely accepted that, by encouraging landowners to cooperate, ABs promote more cost-effective biodiversity conservation than homogeneous payments. This article challenges this conclusion by studying the impact of different AB designs, which may or may not encourage cooperation. Specifically, we show that differentiating the bonus between<br>
internal (within-landholding) and external (between-landholdings) boundaries affects AB cost-effectiveness. Using an economic-ecological model and game theory, our simulations on realistic landscapes show that the most cost-effective ABs are those presenting relatively larger internal bonuses. Conversely, ABs with relatively larger external bonuses are less cost-effective, despite fostering cooperation between landowners.</p>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2024</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2024/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorothée Charlier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 10:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/?p=17631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[2024 2024.09 A local versus global descriptive social norm: A DCE applied to waste sorting behavior in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Lucie Point &#8211; Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu Abstract Previous literature has widely explored the influence of descriptive social norms on individuals’ pro-environmental behavior. However, despite a growing interest in the subject, the role of geographical proximity of]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2024</span></strong></span></h1>
<h4></h4>
<h4><span style="color: #339966;">2024.09</span> <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Poinet_Mahieu_FAERE_WP2024.09.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">A local versus global descriptive social norm: A DCE applied to waste sorting behavior in Phnom Penh, Cambodia</span></a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Lucie Point &#8211; Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="font-weight: 400;">Previous literature has widely explored the influence of descriptive social norms on individuals’ pro-environmental behavior. However, despite a growing interest in the subject, the role of geographical proximity of the reference group remains unclear. Our study seeks to fill this gap by investigating the impact of a descriptive social norm at two scales: local (neighborhood), and global (city). In this aim, we incorporate descriptive norms as attributes in a discrete choice survey. Our findings reveal that only the local social norm exerts a significant influence on organic waste sorting behavior, while the global social norm does not show a significant effect at conventional statistical levels. These results highlight the importance of considering the geographical proximity of the reference group when studying descriptive social norms. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.</p>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr />
<h4><span style="color: #339966;">2024.08</span> <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Melindi-Ghidi_Seegmuller_FAERE_WP2024.08.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">The dynamics of fertility under environmental concerns</span></a></h4>
<h4><span>Paolo Melindi-Ghidi </span><span lang="EN-US">&#8211;</span><span>Thomas Seegmuller </span></h4>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This paper contributes to the literature interested in the new factors that may determine fertility behaviors. Many studies underlay that environmental concerns have a direct effect on households’ fertility decisions. We present a dynamic model that explicitly examines this interplay, considering whether the number of children and environmental concerns may be complementary or substitutable. Interesting results occur when environmental concerns and the number of children are substitutable. At a stable steady state, a stronger effect of environmental concerns on household’s preferences reduces the number of children, as also stressed by a recent literature. The dynamics can be described by an inversely U-shaped relationship between fertility and environmental indicators reflecting the impact of economic production, such as the carbon intensity, as we illustrate using data on US States. The dynamics also explain that regions with lower carbon intensity are those with lower fertility.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<h4><span style="color: #339966;">2024.07</span> <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Kirat_FAERE_WP2024.07.pdf">Revisiting the resource curse: Does volatility matter?</a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Yassine Kirat</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This paper analyzes the impacts of both natural-resource abundance and natural-resource volatility on economic growth. We apply the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach of Gonzales et al. (2005), which is more flexible than the standard fixed-effects model, to data on 87 countries over the 1989-2015 period. Our results suggest that: (i) greater natural-resource abundance significantly raises economic growth, contrary to the resource-curse paradox; (ii) the impact of natural-resource abundance, investment and human capital on GDP growth rate per capita is non-linear, and varies by the level of natural-resource abundance volatility; and (iii) the subsequent GDP growth loss may reach 17 percentage points per year for countries with the highest natural-resource abundance volatility, compared to those with the lowest natural-resource abundance volatility. Volatility in natural-resource revenues and poor governmental responses then seem to drive the resource-curse paradox, instead of natural-resource abundance as such.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr />
<h4><span style="color: #339966;">2024.06</span> <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Gate_Hilal_FAERE_WP2024.06.pdf">Les déterminants des distances domicile-travail : cas des aires urbaines françaises métropolitaines </a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Romain Gaté &#8211; Mohamed Hilal</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">We estimate urban form effects on commuting distances within French urban areas using cross-sectional analysis (1999, 2007 and 2014). A stronger concentration of jobs relative to population within urban areas appears to significantly influence commuting distances. However, our estimates suggest relatively weak effects. Average distances between residence location and workplace would decrease by 10% whether jobs and population were equally distributed within urban areas. Our results show that commuting distances depend on many parameters that differ with spatial distribution of jobs within urban areas (density, demographics and public transport).</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<h4><span style="color: #339966;">2024.05</span> <a href="http://faere.fr/old/pub/WorkingPapers/CombesMotel_Okoko_Schwartz_FAERE_WP2024.05.pdf">Does the the EU-ETS affect the firm&#8217;s capital structure? Evidence from French manufacturing firms</a><span></span></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Pascale Combes Motel &#8211; </span><span>Aimé Okoko &#8211; </span><span>Sonia Schwartz </span></h4>
<div></div>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This study investigates the impact of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) on the capital structure, namely the debt ratio, of French firms from 2007 to 2018. To do this, we construct an original database linking French firms subject to the ETS to their financial variables. Using a matching method, we show that firms participating in the ETS have a higher debt ratio than non-participating ones. To consider the effect of the initial allocation of allowances, we divide our sample of treated firms according to their initial allocation quartile. We find that firms with the lowest initial allowances have the highest debt ratio. Furthermore, the ETS&#8217;s effect on firms&#8217; capital structure is observed during Phase 2 (2008-2012) as opposed to Phase 3 (2013-2020) and concerns firms operating on domestic markets. The effect also differs according to the sectors selected. Our results suggest that, faced with the ETS, firms anticipated the future tightening of environmental constraints. Firms that received the fewest free-of-charge allowances complied by investing in pollution-reduction technologies relying on debt financing. Environmental policy variables, therefore, have an impact on the financial structure of firms.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<hr />
<h4><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>2024.04 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Fournier_FAERE_WP2024.04.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Urban Foodprint and Mitigation Strategies: A Theoretical Analysis</a></strong></span><span></span></h4>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<h4>Anne Fournier</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>Feeding the expanding global population while reducing the environmental impact of farming<br />
and food supply is among the main challenges of the century. Cities, which host the large majority<br />
of the past decade demographic growth, are at the forefront. They are increasingly considering the<br />
relevance of developing policies to explicitly support less-intensive production and/or rebuild their<br />
foodshed so as to reduce their reliance on long-distance food transport. In this paper, we develop<br />
a spatial theoretical model to describe and discuss both economic and environmental implications<br />
of farming practices change and relocation strategies. We highlight that, compared to the market<br />
outcome, promoting less-intensive and local farming may improve the welfare provided that the<br />
marginal opportunity cost of urban land remains low enough. However, we also show that the<br />
conversion from conventional to alternative farming does not necessarily reduce GHG emissions<br />
and may, as a consequence, oﬀset the positive eﬀect on welfare. We finally conduct numerical<br />
simulations so as to illustrate the ambiguous impacts of food relocation.</p>
</div>
<h4><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>2024.03 <a href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Metta_Metta-Versmessen_Alvarado_FAERE_WP2024.03.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Waste Trading System: managing waste with high population density and low sorting rate</a></strong></span></h4>
<h4>Julie Metta &#8211; Coline Metta-Versmessen -Valeria Alvarado</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract </strong></p>
<p><em>Landfilling notoriously has environmental impacts, adversely aﬀecting air, soil and</em> <em>water. It therefore represents a waste management strategy of last resort, and reducing</em> <em>the landfilling rate is essential to mitigating these externalities. Nevertheless, deploying</em><br />
<em>this potential is diﬃcult in the absence of citizen participation in sorting. To correct</em> <em>for these negative externalities and market failure, contemporary policy discussions so</em> <em>far mainly focus on taxation and thus largely overlook market-based solutions. In this</em><br />
<em>study, we first discuss the conditions favouring the eﬀectiveness of a C&amp;T approach for</em> <em>MSW management. We identify five elements characterizing a C&amp;T system for waste:</em> <em>cap definition, allocation of pollution permits, liquidity and market power, price volatil</em><em>ity, and participant compliance; that we further investigate for the implementation of a</em> <em>WTS in large and populated urban areas. We subsequently applied our analysis to the</em> <em>specific case of Hong Kong. We determine the agents concerned, the optimal social cost</em><br />
<em>of waste, the number of permits for the total period as well as its allocation method,</em> <em>together with the potential market design scenario with regard to the particularities of</em> <em>Hong Kong and its climate regulation in the broad sense.</em></p>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<h4><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>2024.02 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/AFIF_BA_JOLTREAU_FAERE_WP2024.02.pdf.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tax-subsidy schemes for recycling when quantity and quality of waste matter.</a></strong></span></h4>
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<h4>Karima Afif – Bocar Samba Ba – Eugénie Joltreau</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>This paper seeks to theoretically understand the impact of a tax-subsidy system (as implemented in Extended Producer Responsibility) on packaging sourcereduction, waste generation, and recycling in the presence of economies of scale<br />
and quality concerns in the recycling industry. We use a static equilibrium and a non-homothetic technology function to study asymmetric substitution between the virgin and the recycled material. The model displays a trade-oﬀ between recycled content and material productivity, and between waste generation and the recycling industry’s profitability. A tax-subsidy scheme in the form of an excise charge and a dual subsidy restores the social optimum, providing that the recycler reaches a positive profit. We find that the excise tax favors virgin material and packaging refinement, all else equal. At the same time, it decreases the use of recycled material, sales, and total waste generation. The subsidy granted to the producer has the opposite eﬀect. The subsidy granted to the recycler increases its profit and the recycling rate.</p>
<h4><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>2024.01 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/BEE-LEROUX_BRECARD_APRAHAMIAN_FAERE_WP2024.01.pdf.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Local label and sustainable labels: a source of consumer confusion? An applied study on the sud region.</a></strong></span></h4>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<h4>Charles Bee-Leroux &#8211; Dorothée Brécard -Frédéric Aprahamian</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p><em>The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of introducing a local label on consumers&#8217; preferences for sustainable labels. The recent literature shows the interest of firms and consumers for labelling schemes. This success is a proof of the increasing sensitivity of consumers to the sustainable market. The other side of the coin is the proliferation of labels which generates confusion in consumers’ choices and leads to mistrust, reducing the visibility of the quality that labels have to guarantee. Labelling has to be like a milestone that guide consumers in their choices, but the multiplication of labels erases this role. Nevertheless, labelling remains one of the main policy tools for sustainable development, especially in the</em><br />
<em>agri-food sector, so it is necessary to remain cautious with new labelling project. Using data from a survey of more than 900 seafood consumers in the Region Sud of France, we analyze their preferences between a local label, a health label, an eco-label, and a fair-trade label, using a ranking method. The aim is to understand how the new regional seafood certificate created by the Region Sud might exacerbate consumers&#8217; difficulties in correctly distinguishing between the different labels. Using a rank-ordered model, we show that the &#8220;health&#8221; label, which remains the preferred label for a large proportion of consumers, is clearly distinguishable from the other three labels. On the other hand, the presence of a local label creates some confusion among consumers with respect to the eco-label and the fair trade label, which it tends to replace. We conclude that the introduction of this new label promoting regional fishing will create more confusion.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2024</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2024-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Fournier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 10:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/?p=16970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-666a4784634dcdb"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4>WP 2024.09 <a href="https://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Poinet_Mahieu_FAERE_WP2024.09.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">A local versus global descriptive social norm: A DCE applied to waste sorting behavior in Phnom Penh, Cambodia</span></a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Lucie Point &ndash; Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract </strong></p>
<p>Previous literature has widely explored the influence of descriptive social norms on individuals&rsquo; pro-environmental behavior. However, despite a growing interest in the subject, the role of geographical proximity of the reference group remains unclear. Our study seeks to fill this gap by investigating the impact of a descriptive social norm at two scales: local (neighborhood), and global (city). In this aim, we incorporate descriptive norms as attributes in a discrete choice survey. Our findings reveal that only the local social norm exerts a significant influence on organic waste sorting behavior, while the global social norm does not show a significant effect at conventional statistical levels. These results highlight the importance of considering the geographical proximity of the reference group when studying descriptive social norms.</p>
<div>
<div>
<div>The policy implications of these findings are discussed.</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.08 <a href="ftp://f&#97;&#101;&#114;e&#64;f&#116;p&#46;fae&#114;&#101;&#46;fr/old/pub/WorkingPapers/Melindi-Ghidi_Seegmuller_FAERE_WP2024.08.pdf"><span lang="EN-US">The dynamics of fertility under environmental concerns</span></a></h4>
<h4>Paolo Melindi-Ghidi <span lang="EN-US">&ndash;</span>Thomas Seegmuller</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This paper contributes to the literature interested in the new factors that may determine fertility behaviors. Many studies underlay that environmental concerns have a direct effect on households&rsquo; fertility decisions. We present a dynamic model that explicitly examines this interplay, considering whether the number of children and environmental concerns may be complementary or substitutable. Interesting results occur when environmental concerns and the number of children are substitutable. At a stable steady state, a stronger effect of environmental concerns on household&rsquo;s preferences reduces the number of children, as also stressed by a recent literature. The dynamics can be described by an inversely U-shaped relationship between fertility and environmental indicators reflecting the impact of economic production, such as the carbon intensity, as we illustrate using data on US States. The dynamics also explain that regions with lower carbon intensity are those with lower fertility.</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.07 <a href="ftp://faere&#64;&#102;&#116;p.f&#97;e&#114;e&#46;&#102;&#114;/old/pub/WorkingPapers/Kirat_FAERE_WP2024.07.pdf">Revisiting the resource curse: Does volatility matter?</a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Yassine Kirat</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div>This paper analyzes the impacts of both natural-resource abundance and natural-resource volatility on economic growth. We apply the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach of Gonzales et al. (2005), which is more flexible than the standard fixed-effects model, to data on 87 countries over the 1989-2015 period. Our results suggest that: (i) greater natural-resource abundance significantly raises economic growth, contrary to the resource-curse paradox; (ii) the impact of natural-resource abundance, investment and human capital on GDP growth rate per capita is non-linear, and varies by the level of natural-resource abundance volatility; and (iii) the subsequent GDP growth loss may reach 17 percentage points per year for countries with the highest natural-resource abundance volatility, compared to those with the lowest natural-resource abundance volatility. Volatility in natural-resource revenues and poor governmental responses then seem to drive the resource-curse paradox, instead of natural-resource abundance as such.</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.06 <a href="ftp://&#102;&#97;&#101;&#114;e&#64;&#102;&#116;&#112;.&#102;&#97;e&#114;e&#46;fr/old/pub/WorkingPapers/Gate_Hilal_FAERE_WP2024.06.pdf">Les d&eacute;terminants des distances domicile-travail : cas des aires urbaines fran&ccedil;aises m&eacute;tropolitaines </a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Romain Gat&eacute; &ndash; Mohamed Hilal</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div>
<div><span lang="EN-US">We estimate urban form effects on commuting distances within French urban areas using cross-sectional analysis (1999, 2007 and 2014). A stronger concentration of jobs relative to population within urban areas appears to significantly influence commuting distances. However, our estimates suggest relatively weak effects. Average distances between residence location and workplace would decrease by 10% whether jobs and population were equally distributed within urban areas. Our results show that commuting distances depend on many parameters that differ with spatial distribution of jobs within urban areas (density, demographics and public transport).</span></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.05 <a href="ftp://f&#97;&#101;re&#64;f&#116;p.f&#97;ere.f&#114;/old/pub/WorkingPapers/CombesMotel_Okoko_Schwartz_FAERE_WP2024.05.pdf">Does the the EU-ETS affect the firm&rsquo;s capital structure? Evidence from French manufacturing firms</a></h4>
<h4><span lang="EN-US">Pascale Combes Motel &ndash; </span>Aim&eacute; Okoko &ndash; Sonia Schwartz</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<div><span lang="EN-US">This study investigates the impact of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) on the capital structure, namely the debt ratio, of French firms from 2007 to 2018. To do this, we construct an original database linking French firms subject to the ETS to their financial variables. Using a matching method, we show that firms participating in the ETS have a higher debt ratio than non-participating ones. To consider the effect of the initial allocation of allowances, we divide our sample of treated firms according to their initial allocation quartile. We find that firms with the lowest initial allowances have the highest debt ratio. Furthermore, the ETS&rsquo;s effect on firms&rsquo; capital structure is observed during Phase 2 (2008-2012) as opposed to Phase 3 (2013-2020) and concerns firms operating on domestic markets. The effect also differs according to the sectors selected. Our results suggest that, faced with the ETS, firms anticipated the future tightening of environmental constraints. Firms that received the fewest free-of-charge allowances complied by investing in pollution-reduction technologies relying on debt financing. Environmental policy variables, therefore, have an impact on the financial structure of firms.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.04 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Fournier_FAERE_WP2024.04.pdf">Urban Foodprint and Mititgation Strategies: A Theoretical Analysis</a></h4>
<h4>Anne Fournier</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract<br>
</strong>Feeding the expanding global population while reducing the environmental impact of farming and food supply is among the main challenges of the century. Cities, which host the large majority of the past decade demographic growth, are at the forefront. They are increasingly considering the relevance of developing policies to explicitly support less-intensive production and/or rebuild their foodshed so as to reduce their reliance on long-distance food transport. In this paper, we develop a spatial theoretical model to describe and discuss both economic and environmental implications of farming practices change and relocation strategies. We highlight that, compared to the market outcome, promoting less-intensive and local farming may improve the welfare provided that the marginal opportunity cost of urban land remains low enough. However, we also show that the conversion from conventional to alternative farming does not necessarily reduce GHG emissions and may, as a consequence, offset the positive effect on welfare. We finally conduct numerical simulations so as to illustrate the ambiguous impacts of food relocation.</p>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.03 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Metta_Metta-Versmessen_Alvarado_FAERE_WP2024.03.pdf">Managing Municipal Solid Waste with low citizen involvement: the case of Hong Kongteurs ?</a></h4>
<h4>Julie Metta &ndash; Coline Metta-Versmessen &ndash; Valeria Alvarado</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract<br>
</strong>While the waste sector has significant decarbonization potential, deploying this potential is difficult in the absence of citizen participation and involvement. In this paper the political management of the waste sector is studied for the case of Hong Kong. Using Weitzman&rsquo;s theorem and extensions, both marginal abatement and damage curves are built to analyse which policy would be the most suitable. From our analysis, we first show that involving citizens in waste reduction and sorting is the main issue for waste management in Hong Kong. Second, we derive that the first best scenario to regulate waste in this context would be through a quantity-based control system. We then detail how this Waste Permit Trading System should be developed to regulate the waste amount in this region. We characterize a system consisting of both landfill permits and recycling credits. We determine the optimal number of permits and credits for the different agents as well as a potential market design that allows for a future linking with the Chinese National Emission Trading System.</p>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.02 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/AFIF_BA_JOLTREAU_FAERE_WP2024.02.pdf">Tax-subsidy schemes for recycling when quantity and quality of waste matter</a></h4>
<h4>Karima Afif &ndash; Bocar Samba BA &ndash; Eug&eacute;nie Joltreau</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract<br>
</strong>This paper seeks to theoretically understand the impact of a tax-subsidy system (as implemented in Extended Producer Responsibility) on packaging source reduction, waste generation, and recycling in the presence of economies of scale and quality concerns in the recycling industry. We use a static equilibrium and a non-homothetic technology function to study asymmetric substitution between the virgin and the recycled material. The model displays a trade-off between recycled content and material productivity, and between waste generation and the recycling industry&rsquo;s profitability. A tax-subsidy scheme in the form of an excise charge and a dual subsidy restores the social optimum, providing that the recycler reaches a positive profit. We find that the excise tax favors virgin material and packaging refinement, all else equal. At the same time, it decreases the use of recycled material, sales, and total waste generation. The subsidy granted to the producer has the opposite effect. The subsidy granted to the recycler increases its profit and the recycling rate.</p>
<hr>
<h4>WP 2024.01 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/BEE-LEROUX_BRECARD_APRAHAMIAN_FAERE_WP2024.01.pdf">Local label and sustainable labels: a source of consumer confusion? An applied study on the sud region</a></h4>
<h4>Charles Bee-Leroux &ndash; Doroth&eacute;e Br&eacute;card &ndash; Fr&eacute;d&eacute;ric Aprahamian</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract<br>
</strong>The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of introducing a local label on consumers&rsquo; preferences for sustainable labels. The recent literature shows the interest of firms and consumers for labeling schemes. This success is a proof of the increasing sensitivity of consumers to the sustainable market. The other side of the coin is the proliferation of labels which generates confusion in consumers&rsquo; choices and leads to mistrust, reducing the visibility of the quality that labels have to guarantee. Labeling has to be like a milestone that guide consumers&rsquo; in their choices, but the multiplication of labels erases this role. Nevertheless, labeling remains one of the main policy tools for sustainable development, especially in the agri-food sector, so it is necessary to remain cautious with new labeling project. Using data from a survey of more than 900 seafood consumers in the Region Sud, we analyze their preferences between a local label, a health label, an eco-label, and a fair-trade label, using a ranking method. The aim is to understand how the new regional seafood certificate created by the Region Sud might exacerbate consumers&rsquo; difficulties in correctly distinguishing between the different labels. Using a rank-ordered model, we show that the &ldquo;health&rdquo; label, which remains the preferred label for a large proportion of consumers, is clearly distinguishable from the other three labels. On the other hand, the presence of a local label creates some confusion among consumers with respect to the eco-label and the fair trade label, which it tends to replace. We conclude that the introduction of this new label promoting regional fishing will create more confusion.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2023</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/2023/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Fournier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/?p=16661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PP 2023-01 International Attitudes Toward Global Policies Adrien Fabre – Thomas Douenne – Linus Mattauch Abstract We document majority support for policies entailing global redistribution and climate mitigation. Recent surveys on 40,680 respondents in 20 countries covering 72% of global carbon emissions show strong support for an effective way to jointly combat climate change and]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>PP 2023-01</strong><br />
<a href="http://faere.fr/pub/PolicyPapers/Fabre_Douenne_Mattauch_FAERE_PP2023.01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>International Attitudes Toward Global Policies</strong></a></h4>
<h4>Adrien Fabre – Thomas Douenne – Linus Mattauch</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br />
We document majority support for policies entailing global redistribution and climate mitigation. Recent surveys on 40,680 respondents in 20 countries covering 72% of global carbon emissions show strong support for an effective way to jointly combat climate change and poverty: a global carbon price funding a global basic income, called the “Global Climate Scheme” (GCS). Using complementary surveys on 8,000 respondents in the U.S., France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, we test several hypotheses that could reconcile strong stated support with a lack of salience in policy<br />
circles. A list experiment shows no evidence of social desirability bias, majorities are willing to sign a real-stake petition, and global redistribution ranks high in the prioritization of policies. Conjoint analyses reveal that a platform is more likely to be preferred if it contains the GCS or a global tax on millionaires. Universalistic attitudes are confirmed by an incentivized donation. In sum, our findings indicate that global policies are genuinely supported by a majority of the population. Public opinion is therefore not the reason that they do not prominently enter political debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2023</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/wp2023/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Fournier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2023 08:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/?p=15599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-906a47846351729"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.11 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Rouille_FAERE_WP2023.11.pdf">Nudging to inform: Priming and social norms to facilitate waste composting</a></strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Alix Rouill&eacute;</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
The combination of social norms and nudges has proven to be a powerful tool for inciting people to adopt pro-environmental behaviors. In this study, we implemented nudges that promote pro-environmental behavior still not explored by behavioral economics: waste composting. In particular, we designed priming and social norm nudges to incite people looking for information about waste composting possibilities. We set up a field experiment with a two-fold purpose. First, remove the barriers towards collective composting in Lyon by using posters related to priming theory with QR Codes that redirect directly to the website of a local association dedicated to environmental actions. Second, these posters created new social norm mechanisms. Since composting is still practiced by only a minority of people in France, the standard way of combining nudges and social norms is insufficient in this context. Here, we focus on descriptive and injunctive norms with local dimensions. These new norms aimed to make the nudge more efficient by increasing the number of scans. We observed that the scans of the posters allowed for a significant increase in the visits to the website over several months, thus improving information about collective waste composting. Although no significant differences were found between social norms treatments, these results show that the QR Code is a promising tool for implementing nudges.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2023.10 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Weill_FAERE_WP2023.10.pdf">Flood Risk Mapping and the Distributional Imapcts of Climate Information</a></strong></h4>
<h4>Joakim Weill</h4>
<p id="tw-target-text" class="tw-data-text tw-text-large tw-ta" dir="ltr" data-placeholder="Traduction" data-ved="2ahUKEwiO2c7fzvqBAxWzSaQEHXvVA6kQ3ewLegQIBhAP"><strong><span class="Y2IQFc" lang="en">This article was elected by the FAERE jury as the best article by a young economist presented at the FAERE 2023 annual conference.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
This paper examines the provision of official flood risk information in the United States and its distributional impacts on residential flood insurance take-up. Assembling all flood maps produced after Hurricane Katrina, I document that updated maps decreased the number of properties zoned in high-risk floodplains and incorrectly omitted five million properties, primarily in neighborhoods with more Black and Hispanic residents. Leveraging the staggered timing of map updates, I estimate they decreased flood insurance take-up and exacerbated racial disparities in insurance coverage. Correcting flood maps could increase welfare by $20 billion annually, but past map updates distorted risk and price signals.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.09 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Desroziers_Kirat_Reisinezhad_FAERE_WP2023.09.pdf">Carbon curse : As you extract, so you will burn </a></strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Adrien Desroziers &ndash; Yassine Kirat &ndash; Arsham Reisinezhad</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
The &ldquo;Carbon Curse&rdquo; theory suggests that fossil fuel richness leads countries to have more carbon intensive development trajectories than they would otherwise. Using causal inference for cross-country panel data spanning 1950-2018, we globally estimate the effect of giant oil and gas discoveries on carbon emissions. Our findings show that the effect is sizable and persistent. Countries that discovered large fossil-fuel fields emit roughly 30% more pollution post-discovery than countries without these discoveries. This effect is stronger in developing countries, and is substantial from the date of the first giant discovery. By exploiting the randomness of the timing of discoveries, we provide the first plausibly-causal evidence in support of the &ldquo;Carbon Curse&rdquo;.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.08 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Fabre_Douenne_Mattauch_FAERE_WP2023.08.pdf">International Attitudes Toward Global Policies</a></strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Adrien Fabre &ndash; Thomas Douenne &ndash; Linus Mattauch</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
We document majority support for policies entailing global redistribution and climate mitigation. Recent surveys on 40,680 respondents in 20 countries covering 72% of global carbon emissions show strong support for an effective way to jointly combat climate change and poverty: a global carbon price funding a global basic income, called the &ldquo;Global Climate Scheme&rdquo; (GCS). Using complementary surveys on 8,000 respondents in the U.S., France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, we test several hypotheses that could reconcile strong stated support with a lack of salience in policy<br>
circles. A list experiment shows no evidence of social desirability bias, majorities are willing to sign a real-stake petition, and global redistribution ranks high in the prioritization of policies. Conjoint analyses reveal that a platform is more likely to be preferred if it contains the GCS or a global tax on millionaires. Universalistic attitudes are confirmed by an incentivized donation. In sum, our findings indicate that global policies are genuinely supported by a majority of the population. Public opinion is therefore not the reason that they do not prominently enter political debates.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2023.07 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Gatti_Lo_Serranito_FAERE_WP2023.07.pdf">Unpacking the green box: Determinants of Environmental Policy Stringency in European countries</a></strong></h4>
<h4>Donatella Gatti &ndash; Gaye-Del Lo &ndash; Francisco Serranito</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract : </strong><br>
This paper identifies the determinants of OECD Environmental Policy Stringency (EPS) index using a panel of 21 European countries for the period 2009-2019. If there is a large literature on the macroeconomic, political, and social determinants of EPS, the people&rsquo;s attitudes or preferences toward environmental policies is still burgeoning. Thus, the main goal of this paper is to estimate the effects of people&rsquo;s awareness regarding environmental issues on the EPS indicator. Due to the endogeneity of preferences, we have applied an instrumental variable framework to estimate our empirical model. Our most important result is to show that individual environmental preferences have a positive and significant effect on the level of EPS indicator : on average, a rise in individual preferences of 10% in a country will increase its EPS indicator by 2.30%. Our results have important policy implications.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2023.06 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Shirizadeh_Quirion_FAERE_WP2023.06.pdf">Long-term optimization of the hydrogen-electrivity nexus in France</a><br>
</strong></h4>
<h4>Behrang Shirizadeh &ndash; Philippe Quirion</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract </strong><br>
We model the optimal hydrogen and electricity production and storage mix for France by 2050. Moreover, an iterative calculation method to represent electrolyzer lifetime based on functioning hours in linear programming is developed. We provide a central scenario and study its sensitivity to the cost of electrolyzers, to hydrogen demand and to renewable energy deployment potential. The proportion of electrolysis to methane reforming with CO2 capture and storage in hydrogen production is sensitive to the cost of electrolyzers, with the former providing around 60% in the central scenario. However, the system cost as well as the hydrogen and electricity production costs are much more robust, thanks to the wide feasible near-optimal solutions spectrum. The electricity production mix is almost fully renewable in the central scenario, while nuclear power has a significant role only if the potential of wind &amp; solar limits their deployment, or if CO2 capture and storage is not authorized. Furthermore, exclusion of reformer-based hydrogen from fossil gas with CO22 capture induces negligible additional cost to the hydrogen-electricity coupled system (below 1%). Therefore, in the current European resilience and sovereignty context, a robust low-carbon hydrogen development strategy would be prioritizing green hydrogen to other low-carbon hydrogen supply options.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.05 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Bottega_Brecard_Delacote_FAERE_WP2023.05.pdf">Greening or greenwashing? How consumers&rsquo; beliefs influence firms&rsquo; advertising strategies on environmental quality</a><br>
</strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Lucie Bottega &ndash; Doroth&eacute;e Br&eacute;card &ndash; Philippe Delacote</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
When consumers have ambiguous beliefs about the green quality of products, firms may be tempted to &ldquo;greenwash&rdquo;. The degrees of optimism and confidence of consumers then play a crucial role in firms&rsquo; advertising strategies, which can be either informative and/or persuasive. We find conditions under which advertising efforts and environmental quality are substitutes and thus lead to greenwashing.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.04 </strong><a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Meunier_Ponssard_FAERE_WP2023.04.pdf">Green industrial policy, information asymmetry and repayable advance</a></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Guy Meunier &ndash; Jean-Pierre Ponssard</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Abstract<br>
</b>The energy transition requires the deployment of risky research and development (R&amp;D) programs, most of which are partially financed by public funding. Recent recovery plans, associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy transition, increased the funding available to finance innovative low-carbon projects and call for an economic evaluation of their allocation. This paper analyzes the potential benefit of using repayable advance: a lump-sum payment to finance the project that is paid back in case of success. The relationship between the state and innovative firms is formalized in the principal agent framework. Investing in an innovative project requires an initial observable capital outlay. We introduce asymmetric information on the probability of success, which is known to the firm but not to the state agency. The outcome of the project, if successful, delivers a private benefit to the firm and an external social benefit to the state. In this context a repayable advance consists in rewarding failure. We prove that it is a superior strategy in the presence of pure adverse selection. We investigate under what conditions this result could be extended in the presence of moral hazard. Implications for green industrial policy are discussed.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.03 </strong><a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Gatti_Vauday_FAERE_WP2023.03.pdf">Environmental transition through social change and lobbying by citizens</a></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Donatella Gatti &ndash; Julien Vauday</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Abstract<br>
</b>While environmental values are spreading among societies, they hardly lead to effective political actions. This may be due to an overestimation of the sharing of those values among people, or to a lack of political power of environmentalists vis-&agrave;-vis materialist citizens. We propose a theoretical model to investigate these two channels, based on a setup a la Grossman and Helpman (1994), in which lobby is a strategy available to social groups, in order to influence the government on environmental taxes. Because societies have being historically marked by materialist habits, citizens sharing those habits face lower costs when getting organized. By considering endogenous lobby formation a la Mitra (1999), we show that, in order for environmental and materialist lobbies to coexist, the society must be mixed enough. Based on a dynamic framework a la Besley and Persson (2023), we investigate how social values change over time. Whenever lobbying by materialists prevails, a unique social equilibrium exists, featuring a stable hegemony by materialist values. If environmentalists get organized too, a second social equilibrium emerges, that is locally stable and more favorable to them. However, the threshold might be very high, above which the cultural transition effectively takes off. By calibrating the model, we study counter-acting forces allowing to improve the odds of the environmental transition, such as cultural mutations, social-signaling, and lowering organizational costs. Finally, we provide policy implications.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.02 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Cassin_Mejean_Zuber_FAERE_WP2023.02.pdf">Go where the wind does not blow: Climate damages heterogeneity and future migrations</a><br>
</strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Lesly Cassin &ndash; Aur&eacute;lie M&eacute;jean &ndash; St&eacute;phane Zuber</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Abstract</b><br>
In the context of climate change, migration can be considered as an adaptation strategy to reduce populations&rsquo; exposure to climate damages. Those damages are very heterogeneous across regions. In this paper, we study migration induced by climate change damages. To do so, we estimate the socio-economic determinants of migration, focusing on economic damages. We then model endogenous migration in an integrated assessment model based on those estimates. We highlight the importance of the heterogeneity of the damages distribution to explain migration fows due to climate change. We find that high levels of climate damages globally do not necessarily induce large climate migration. Rather, large differences in exposure between regions may lead to substantial migration.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2023.01 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Choumert_LeRoux_FAERE_WP2023.01.pdf">Internal Migration and Energy Poverty</a><br>
</strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Johanna Choumert-Nkolo &ndash; Leonard le Roux</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><b>Abstract</b><br>
This paper presents a first analysis of the relationship between rural-urban migration and energy poverty in South Africa, and to the authors&rsquo; knowledge in Africa, using a nationally representative panel dataset. Using a dynamic difference in differences approach, energy poverty changes for both migrants and non-migrants are tracked over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2017. On average, moving to urban areas results in reductions in energy poverty for migrants themselves, with especially dramatic reductions in the use of traditional cooking fuels. Roughly one in five new urban arrivals move into informal shack dwellings where initial gains in energy access are negligible, but even for these migrants, the gains from migration grow over time. Effects on households, differences between male and female migrants, and other amenitities are also explored.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Show More</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Show Less</button></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2022</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/pp2022/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Fournier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/?p=14366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PP 2022-01 The case for a Carbon Border Adjustment: Where do economists stand? Published in Environmental Economics and Policy Studies (2023), 25: 435–469 Aliénor Cameron &#8211; Marc Baudry Abstract On 14 July 2021, the European Commission formally adopted a proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism to mitigate the risk of carbon leakage caused by its]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>PP 2022-01</strong><br />
<a href="http://faere.fr/pub/PolicyPapers/Cameron_Baudry_FAERE_PP2022.01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>The case for a Carbon Border Adjustment: Where do economists stand?</strong></a></h4>
<p>Published in <i>Environmental Economics and Policy Studies</i> (2023), 25: 435–469</p>
<h4>Aliénor Cameron &#8211; Marc Baudry</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br />
<em>On 14 July 2021, the European Commission formally adopted a proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism to mitigate the risk of carbon leakage caused by its increasingly ambitious environmental policies. There is a gap between the ways in which this issue is discussed in political spheres and the evidence provided by economic literature on it. The aim of this paper is to bridge this gap by presenting the context and policy debate surrounding carbon leakage and CBAs in the EU, reviewing the state of the economic literature on this topic, and discussing further research that is necessary to answer remaining policy concerns and unresolved research questions.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>2022</title>
		<link>https://faere.fr/en/wp2022/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Fournier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2022 11:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://faere.fr/?p=14204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<section class="l-section wpb_row height_small mpc-row"><div class="l-section-h i-cf"><div class="g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default"><div class="vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container mpc-column" data-column-id="mpc_column-996a4784635580a"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2022.10 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Kogel_FAERE_WP2022.10.pdf">The impact of air pollution on labour productivity in France</a><br>
</strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Clara K&ouml;gel</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
This paper investigates the effect of air pollution on labour productivity in French establishments in both manufacturing and non-financial market services sectors from 2001 to 2018. An instrumental variable approach based on planetary boundary layer height and wind speed allows identifying the causal effect of air pollution on labour productivity. The finding shows that a 10% increase in fine particulate matter leads, on average, to a 1.5% decrease in labour productivity, controlling for firm-specific characteristics and other confounding factors. The analysis also considers different dimensions of heterogeneity driving this adverse effect. The negative impact of pollution is mainly driven by service-intensive firms and sectors with a high share of highly skilled workers. This finding is in line with the expectation that air pollution affects cognitive skills, concentration, headache, and fatigue in non-routine cognitive tasks. Compared to the marginal abatement cost of PM 2.5 reductions by the Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC, the estimated gains only from the labour productivity channel could largely offset the abatement cost. All in all, these estimates suggest that the negative impact of air pollution is much larger than previously documented in the literature.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>WP 2022.09 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Labroue_Bureau_FAERE_WP2022.09.pdf">Construire un indicateur de PIB inclusif et soutenable. Que peuvent apporter les valeurs de r&eacute;f&eacute;rence du calcul &eacute;conomique ?</a><br>
(Building an inclusive and sustainable GDP indicator)</strong></h4>
<h4 style="text-align: justify;">Selma Labroue &ndash; Dominique Bureau</h4>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
<span lang="EN-GB">National accounts ignore the non-market components of well-being linked to the state of the environment and leave aside questions of inclusiveness and sustainability, &ldquo;GDP&rdquo; remains the key indicator for assessing the wealth of a country.&nbsp;</span>Following the Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi commission, this indicator was supplemented by additional indicators, which made it possible to enrich the analyses, but at the cost of the dispersion of ever more multidimensional approaches. In this paper, we examine the opportunity of supplementing the usual indicators of GDP and savings, to integrate into them the dimensions linked to equity, the natural heritage (greenhouse effect and biodiversity), education and population health.&nbsp;<span lang="EN-GB">These adjustments lead us to the evaluation of a new GDP, of the order of 1,500 billion euros in 2019.</span></p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.08</strong>&nbsp;<a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Berman_Couttenier_Leblois_Soubeyran_FAERE_WP2022.08.pdf">Crop Prices and Deforestation in the Tropics</a></h4>
<p>Published in <i>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management</i>&nbsp;(2023), 119: 102819,</p>
<h4>Nicolas Berman &ndash; Mathieu Couttenier &ndash; Antoine Leblois &ndash; Raphael Soubeyran</h4>
<p><strong>A</strong><strong>bstract<br>
</strong>Global food demand is rising, driven by a growing world population and dietary changes in developing countries. This situation encourages farmers to increase crop production which, in turn, increases worldwide demand for agricultural land and the pressure on tropical forests. Given the probability that growth in world food demand will continue, this pressure is not likely to abate in coming decades. While the impact of food demand on deforestation has been in the headlines, rigorous evidence of the relationship between international crop prices and deforestation using large-N data remains scarce. We attempt to quantify this link during the twenty-first century using high-resolution annual forest loss data for tropical regions, combined with information on crop-specific agricultural suitability and annual global commodity prices. We find that price variation has a sizable impact on deforestation: crop price increases are estimated tobe responsible for a third of the total deforested area in the tropics (approx. 2 million km&sup2;) during the period 2001-2018. We also find that the degree of openness to international trade and level of economic development are first-order local characteristics affecting the magnitude of the impact of crop prices on deforestation.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.07</strong>&nbsp;<a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Crepin_FAERE_WP2022.07.pdf">Do forest conservation policies undermine the soybean sector in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from the blacklisting of municipalities</a></h4>
<h4>L&eacute;a Crepin</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
Minimizing the trade-offs between agricultural production, development and forest conservation is key to ensure that conservation policies can achieve long-term impacts. Taking the case of the Brazilian Amazon in the context of the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon, we estimate the impact of the blacklisting of municipalities with high deforestation risk on soybean production (a major driver of deforestation), exports and land-use changes. Difference-in-difference regressions and generalised synthetic control method are first used to determine the impacts of the policy. The triple difference strategy is then applied to explore heterogeneity in the production and export changes across municipalities. We find that, although effective to reduce deforestation, the policy is unlikely to have undermined the soybean production and exports. On the contrary, our results suggest that the soybean sector benefited from the changes in land use following the implementation of the blacklist. However, we do not find evidence that land restriction triggered intensification of soybean production, which suggests that soybean benefited from an intra-crops reallocation.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.06</strong> <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Mavi_Zou_FAERE_WP2022.06.pdf"><strong>Controlling an infectious disease and sustainability: lessons from Hartwick&rsquo;s Rule</strong></a></h4>
<h4>Can Askan Mavi &ndash; Benteng Zou</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
This paper tries to understand how a pandemic disease changes the relationship between different production factors such as labor, capital and natural resource extraction under maximin criterion, that consists of providing a constant utility to each generation over time. We show that the prevention policy plays an important role to implement an optimal and sustainable economy. We also show that a public policy such as lockdown or social distancing may decrease or increase the natural resource extraction, depending on the cost of the public policy. Understanding these opposite cases is crucial to know how to create a sovereign wealth fund (i.e, capital accumulation) that is composed by natural resource rents. Another important result is that in an economy facing a pandemic, an increase in natural resource extraction does not mean a direct increase in capital accumulation as documented in the existing literature. In this sense, we also challenge the well-known Hartwick rule&rsquo;s &ldquo;all resource rents invested in capital accumulation&rdquo; idea.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.05</strong> <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Sy_Figuieres_Rey-Valette_Howarth_DeWit_FAERE_WP2022.05.pdf"><strong>Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Social Choice: The Impact of Deliberation in the context of two different Aggregation Rules</strong></a></h4>
<p>Forthcoming in <i>Social Choice &amp; Welfare</i></p>
<h4>Mariam Sy &ndash; Charles Figui&egrave;res &ndash; H&eacute;l&egrave;ne Rey-Valette &ndash; Richard Howarth &ndash; Rutger De Wit</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
This paper describes an empiric study of aggregation and deliberation &ndash; used during citizens&rsquo; workshops &ndash; for the elicitation of collective preferences over 20 different ecosystem services (ESs) delivered by the Palavas coastal lagoons located on the shore of the Mediterranean Sea close to Montpellier (S. France). The impact of deliberation is apprehended by comparing the collectives preferences constructed with and without deliberation. The same aggregation rules were used before and after deliberation. We compared two different aggregation methods, i.e. Rapid Ecosystem Services Participatory Appraisal (RESPA) and Majority Judgement (MJ). RESPA had been specifically tested for ESs, while MJ evaluates the merit of each item, an ES in our case, in a predefined ordinal scale of judgment. The impact of deliberation was strongest for the RESPA method. This new information acquired from application of social choice theory is particularly useful for ecological economics studying ES, and more practically for the development of deliberative approaches for public policies.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.0</strong><strong>4 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Kahouli_Pautrel_FAERE_WP2022.04.pdf">Why health matters in the energy efficiency&ndash;energy consumption nexus? Some answers from a life cycle analysis</a></strong></h4>
<p>Published in <i>The Energy Journal</i>&nbsp;(2023), 44:<i><br>
</i></p>
<h4>Sond&egrave;s Kahouli &ndash; Xavier Pautrel</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
This paper shows that accounting for the growing interdisciplinary literature supporting the causality between energy efficiency and health and the empirical evidence re-assessing the importance of health in workforce productivity, could explain a part of the paradoxal relationship found between energy efficiency and energy consumption.<br>
We build a 3-period overlapping generations model where we assume that residential energy inefficiency induces chronic disease for adults and bad health for elderly. We also assume that workers&rsquo; health has an effect of their labor productivity. Our results suggest, in particular, that if mostly old (respectively young) people health is affected, the health impact of residential energy efficiency should have a backfire (resp. rebound) influence on residential energy consumption, by promoting precautionary saving (resp. by rising labor productivity).<br>
In policy terms, by showing that the link between energy efficiency and energy consumption is far from being just associated with technical conditions about preferences and/or production technology, our research emphasizes how crucial and complex are for governments the discussion and policy action dealing with the connection between energy conservation policies, health insurance system and growth.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.03 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Bureau_FAERE_WP2022.03.pdf">Carbon Footprints, Traded Emissions and Carbon-Price Cooperation Equity</a></strong></h4>
<h4>Dominique Bureau</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
Existing gaps between territorial inventories of CO2 emissions and carbon footprints resulting from the final domestic demands of countries highlight the need to reduce imported emissions in developed countries. Generalized carbon border pricing would help but it requires avoiding the risk of its use as a trade barrier. However, such an import tax is not the unique possible approach and it is not a substitute for enhanced climate cooperation.<br>
In addition to the advantages usually put forward in terms of efficiency and mechanism design, the setting of a common carbon price, by the means of national taxes or a cap and trade mechanism, would present a threefold interest in this context: of discarding the objections of trade distortions against climate policies; of regulating imported emissions and internal emissions with the same level of ambition; and of acting both on the use of products as well as on their processes. Footprint taxation is then unnecessary, except with non-participants.<br>
But a Green Fund is needed for fair sharing of the burden of the efforts. Moreover, its rules must be adapted when integrating trade-related emissions, which has not been pointed out so far in the debates on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Corresponding conditions are specified here and it is underlined that this approach has also the advantage having to deal only with the net distributive effects involving trade in carbon.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.02 <a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Zappala_FAERE_WP2022.02.pdf">Drought exposure and accuracy: Motivated reasoning in climate change beliefs</a></strong></h4>
<p>Published in <i>Environmental and Resource Economics</i>&nbsp;(2023), 85: 649&ndash;672</p>
<h4>Guglielmo Zappal&agrave;</h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br>
Despite scientific consensus, there is no unanimity among individuals in the beliefs about climate change and its consequences. Understanding how people form these beliefs and what drives their interpretation of climatic events is essential, especially in developing countries and among agricultural communities, which may most suffer the consequences of climate change. Using survey data from rural households in Bangladesh together with a meteorological measure of excess dryness relative to historical averages, this paper studies how long-term average exposure to dryness and short-term deviations shape beliefs of increase in droughts and the interpretation of drought events. To explore how agents interpret past droughts, I use an instrumental variable approach and investigate whether individual beliefs lead to distortions of objective information in an asymmetric manner. The results show that individuals&rsquo; interpretation of droughts is biased in the direction of their prior beliefs, providing suggestive evidence of confirmation bias as a directional motivated reasoning mechanism. The findings highlight the need for models that account for behavioral factors to study climate change beliefs and their implications for effective communication and adaptation policies.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div><div class="w-separator size_large with_line width_default thick_1 style_dashed color_primary align_center"><div class="w-separator-h"></div></div><div class="wpb_text_column us_custom_432d3f53 with_collapsible_content" data-content-height="500px"><div class="wpb_wrapper"><h4><strong>WP 2022.01 </strong><span lang="FR"><span id="OBJ_PREFIX_DWT570_com_zimbra_url" class="Object" role="link"><a href="http://faere.fr/pub/WorkingPapers/Rao_Grover_Charlier_FAERE_WP2022.01.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong><span id="page6R_mcid12" class="markedContent"><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">Local economic development through clean electricity generation &ndash; an analysis for Brazil and a staggered difference-in-difference approach</span></span></strong></a></span></span></h4>
<h4><span lang="FR">Swaroop Rao &ndash; David Grover &ndash; Doroth&eacute;e Charlier<br>
</span></h4>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong><br>
</strong>Adaptation of energy systems worldwide to move away from fossil fuels is widely accepted to be a key step in responding to the challenge of climate change. For developing countries and their development banks, this challenge is compounded by the need to ensure economic development, particularly to lift parts of the population out of poverty. In this article, we analyse the economic impacts of electricity generation projects of the Brazilian national development bank. We use a two-way fixed-effects (TWFE) estimator on a 15-year municipality-level panel with time-varying (or &ldquo;staggered&rdquo;) treatment that accounts for recent findings in the panel data analysis literature. Our study finds that clean electricity generation has weaker economic effects compared to fossil electricity generation and compared to other projects of the development bank. This differentiated impact is particularly notable when it comes to the impact of investment on employment creation and wage levels. This is the first study that uses microdata to analyse the different economic impacts of clean electricity generation and fossil electricity generation at the local level. We posit that differences in labour intensities of clean electricity generation jobs and the jobs created by fossil electricity generation as well as other types of development bank investment account for these different impacts of project investments. We recommend that the cost of externalities of these projects be internalised in order for development banks and policymakers to get a fuller picture of the benefits brought about by them. Smaller economic impacts of certain development bank investments might also have negative implications for poverty reduction efforts in the country.</p>
</div><div class="toggle-links align_none"><button class="collapsible-content-more">Read more</button><button class="collapsible-content-less">Read less</button></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
